![]() "A black man meets his white girlfriend's parents for the first time it's a horror movie" is the kind of pitch that might earn a delighted "I'm down, brother!" chuckle from the father of said white girlfriend, a brain surgeon played by Bradley Whitford who tells the hero Chris (Daniel Kaluuya) that he would vote for Obama a third time if he could. ![]() I rarely feel this confident about a film sight-unseen, but as a longtime fan of Peele, it seemed clear that he knew exactly what his movie was about a deep level. Instead, kinesthetic culture reveals a concomitant.As soon as I heard that Jordan Peele's debut feature had the plot of an edgy indie romantic comedy but was in fact "a horror movie," I knew it was going to be terrific. Kinesthetic culture is itself entirely unstable and thus "fails" to remain fixed even on a trajectory toward disembodied pleasure. Surfing the Web or television offerings, by clinking from screen to screen consumers at the millennium enjoy lively, sometimes disembodied kinesthetic pleasure. Advertisers' perennial promise that their products are "new and improved" has helped to drive contemporary preoccupations with morphing it has also subtended preoccupations with such disparate activities as plastic surgery that changes the human body and interest in Pokemon that transform as they evolve. Marked by a prevailing, restless obsession with both change and sensory experience, kinesthetic culture circulates the notion that interactivity is somehow inherently attractive. The remarkable appeal of this particular image supports my contention that we have moved beyond aural culture, even beyond visual culture, and are now members of a kinesthetic culture where the "beauty" of a thing resides in the degree to which it invites interactivity, where the (sexual) appeal of a star image depends on the amount of play it offers to audiences. (2) A pastiche of "masculine" and "feminine" traits, the Malkovich image is symptomatic of millennial culture. The Malkovich image is a phantasmagoric effect created in some measure by journalists' (or publicists') accounts of the actor's biography and by Malkovich's picture personality, which has emerged from equations between the actor and the characters he has portrayed in films such as Places in the Heart (1984), The Killing Fields (1984), Dangerous Liaisons (1988), and In the Line of Fire (1993). Instead, the Malkovich allure issues from and is dispersed across an intertextual body of public "performances" by Malkovich and a constellation of public image makers. ![]() Tethered to a physicality worlds apart from the sublime beauty of a matinee idol, Malkovich's audience appeal has no fixed location in his body (no supple voice, bedroom eyes, or elegant profile). always manage to permeate the air with coarse, unmitigated allure" (Chang 2). Described in general in the nineties press as a "nonstandard hunk" (Rosenbaum 52), Malkovich is a public figure who can, "even with all his soft, undefinable formlessness. Yet because Malkovich has, in spite of that, also portrayed characters marked by their compulsory hypermasculine aggressiveness, the actor's enigmatic image offers millennium audiences a figure easily tailored to multivalent consumer desires. Past forty, with a receding hairline, wide waist, and nondescript biceps, Malkovich embodies the cliche of the nonthreatening New Age man. ![]() (1) It points to the central premise of the essay, namely, that John Malkovich is a bankable media commodity because his star image plays into contemporary interest in ambiguous sexualities and gender identities. magazine about HSX, an Internet stock market that lets customers buy imaginary shares in film properties and media celebrities. This essay's main title, "Buying John Malkovich," is borrowed from an article in the August 2000 issue of Inc.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |